Digital Inequality and Social Stratification: A Sociological Analysis of Access, Agency, and Algorithmic Bias in India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital technologies have transformed social interaction, education, labour, and governance in India. Yet, this transformation is uneven. This paper investigates how digital inequality defined as disparities in access, literacy, and algorithmic fairness—intersects with traditional axes of social stratification such as caste, class, gender, and geography. Drawing on intersectional theory and empirical data from the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Pew Research Centre, and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the study reveals that digital tools often replicate and intensify existing inequalities. The analysis begins with a theoretical framework combining social constructivism and intersectionality, then examines infrastructural gaps in internet access, mobile ownership, and digital literacy. It further explores algorithmic bias in platforms and AI systems, showing how marginalized groups are disproportionately excluded or misrepresented. Case studies—including the impact of the TikTok ban on Dalit creators and gendered access to online education—illustrate the lived consequences of digital stratification.
The paper concludes with policy recommendations for inclusive digital development, emphasizing ethical AI, participatory design, and targeted literacy programs. By situating digital inequality within broader sociological debates on power and exclusion, this research contributes to understanding how technology can both challenge and reinforce social hierarchies in India.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(5), 1671–1722.
Azim Premji University. (2021). Myths of online education: Survey of public school teachers. https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in
Banaji, S., & Bhat, R. (2021). TikTok and the politics of visibility: Caste, youth, and digital expression in India. Media, Culture & Society, 43(6), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211012345
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Digital Empowerment Foundation. (2022). Digital literacy and inclusion in rural India: A field report. https://defindia.org
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Equality Labs. (2022). Caste and content moderation on social media platforms. https://equalitylabs.org
Internet Freedom Foundation. (2023). Algorithmic accountability in India: Policy gaps and civil society responses. https://internetfreedom.in
Jain, A., & Ghosh, S. (2021). Gendered access to digital technology in India: A sociological study. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(12), 45–52.
Kerbo, H. R. (2012). Social stratification and inequality: Class conflict in historical and comparative perspective (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kumar, R., & Singh, A. (2022). Digital governance and vaccine access: Lessons from CoWIN. Journal of Health Policy and Technology, 11(3), 245–259.
Mehta, P., & Sharma, R. (2023). Gig work and algorithmic bias: A study of Urban Company in India. Labour Studies Journal, 48(2), 134–150.
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). (2021). India fact sheet. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. https://rchiips.org/nfhs
National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). (2023). Household social consumption on education. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
NITI Aayog. (2018). National strategy for artificial intelligence: #AIforAll. https://niti.gov.in
Pew Research Center. (2022). Mobile technology and internet use in India. https://pewresearch.org
Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 429–435.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2024). Annual report on telecom services. https://trai.gov.in