Digital Inequality and Social Stratification: A Sociological Analysis of Access, Agency, and Algorithmic Bias in India

Main Article Content

Dr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey

Abstract

Digital technologies have transformed social interaction, education, labour, and governance in India. Yet, this transformation is uneven. This paper investigates how digital inequality defined as disparities in access, literacy, and algorithmic fairness—intersects with traditional axes of social stratification such as caste, class, gender, and geography. Drawing on intersectional theory and empirical data from the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Pew Research Centre, and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the study reveals that digital tools often replicate and intensify existing inequalities. The analysis begins with a theoretical framework combining social constructivism and intersectionality, then examines infrastructural gaps in internet access, mobile ownership, and digital literacy. It further explores algorithmic bias in platforms and AI systems, showing how marginalized groups are disproportionately excluded or misrepresented. Case studies—including the impact of the TikTok ban on Dalit creators and gendered access to online education—illustrate the lived consequences of digital stratification.


 The paper concludes with policy recommendations for inclusive digital development, emphasizing ethical AI, participatory design, and targeted literacy programs. By situating digital inequality within broader sociological debates on power and exclusion, this research contributes to understanding how technology can both challenge and reinforce social hierarchies in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biography

Dr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Department of Sociology, Maharaj Balwant Singh (P.G) college Gangapur Varanasi/Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh

Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Maharaj Balwant Singh (P.G) college Gangapur Varanasi/Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

How to Cite

Digital Inequality and Social Stratification: A Sociological Analysis of Access, Agency, and Algorithmic Bias in India. (2026). The Society and People, 1(1), 39-50. https://thesocietyandpeople.com/index.php/tsap/article/view/6

References

Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(5), 1671–1722.

Azim Premji University. (2021). Myths of online education: Survey of public school teachers. https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in

Banaji, S., & Bhat, R. (2021). TikTok and the politics of visibility: Caste, youth, and digital expression in India. Media, Culture & Society, 43(6), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211012345

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

Digital Empowerment Foundation. (2022). Digital literacy and inclusion in rural India: A field report. https://defindia.org

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

Equality Labs. (2022). Caste and content moderation on social media platforms. https://equalitylabs.org

Internet Freedom Foundation. (2023). Algorithmic accountability in India: Policy gaps and civil society responses. https://internetfreedom.in

Jain, A., & Ghosh, S. (2021). Gendered access to digital technology in India: A sociological study. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(12), 45–52.

Kerbo, H. R. (2012). Social stratification and inequality: Class conflict in historical and comparative perspective (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Kumar, R., & Singh, A. (2022). Digital governance and vaccine access: Lessons from CoWIN. Journal of Health Policy and Technology, 11(3), 245–259.

Mehta, P., & Sharma, R. (2023). Gig work and algorithmic bias: A study of Urban Company in India. Labour Studies Journal, 48(2), 134–150.

National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). (2021). India fact sheet. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. https://rchiips.org/nfhs

National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). (2023). Household social consumption on education. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

NITI Aayog. (2018). National strategy for artificial intelligence: #AIforAll. https://niti.gov.in

Pew Research Center. (2022). Mobile technology and internet use in India. https://pewresearch.org

Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 429–435.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2024). Annual report on telecom services. https://trai.gov.in